- SemantisAI Judgment summaries.
- Topics
- Interpretation
InterpretationInterpretation
+1+1
![AIG South Africa Limited v 43 Air School Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others [2024] ZASCA 97 (13 June 2024)](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=800,height=421,fit=scale-down,onerror=redirect/uploads/publication/thumbnail/6645f3a5-b6b3-4c99-81c1-b324371dd951/landscape_DALL_E_2023-10-19_13.55.04_-_Photo_of_a_stylish_logo_for_a_legal_semantic_search_firm_named__Semantis.AI_._A_magnifying_glass__which_has_nodes_interconnected_to_depict_semantic_se.png){kind=logo}
AIG South Africa Limited v 43 Air School Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others [2024] ZASCA 97 (13 June 2024)
Insurance law: The insurance policy was composite, requiring individual compliance with reporting obligations by each insured entity. The court also held that the insured peril included both the outbreak of the disease and the government response, thereby covering the business interruption losses. Additionally, the court underscored the necessity of proving insured status under the policy.
Ross Shepstone
InterpretationInterpretation
+2+2
Weissensee v Stone-Bird Investments (PTY) Ltd and Others (2020/19821) [2022] ZAGPJHC 817; [2022] 4 All SA 905 (GJ) (17 October 2022)
An agreement entered into by a financial services provider that is not licensed under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS Act) is void ab initio due to non-compliance with statutory licensing requirements. Consequently, any such agreement is unenforceable.
Ross Shepstone
InterpretationInterpretation
+1+1
InterpretationInterpretation
+2+2
![University of Johannesburg v Auckland Park Theological Seminary and Another [2021] ZACC 13.](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=800,height=421,fit=scale-down,onerror=redirect/uploads/asset/file/b1780b1d-acb0-4894-871b-e79daea02de9/lady_justice_1.jpg)