- SemantisAI Judgment summaries.
- Topics
- contract
![AIG South Africa Limited v 43 Air School Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others [2024] ZASCA 97 (13 June 2024)](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=800,height=421,fit=scale-down,onerror=redirect/uploads/publication/thumbnail/6645f3a5-b6b3-4c99-81c1-b324371dd951/landscape_DALL_E_2023-10-19_13.55.04_-_Photo_of_a_stylish_logo_for_a_legal_semantic_search_firm_named__Semantis.AI_._A_magnifying_glass__which_has_nodes_interconnected_to_depict_semantic_se.png){kind=logo}
AIG South Africa Limited v 43 Air School Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others [2024] ZASCA 97 (13 June 2024)
Insurance law: The insurance policy was composite, requiring individual compliance with reporting obligations by each insured entity. The court also held that the insured peril included both the outbreak of the disease and the government response, thereby covering the business interruption losses. Additionally, the court underscored the necessity of proving insured status under the policy.
Weissensee v Stone-Bird Investments (PTY) Ltd and Others (2020/19821) [2022] ZAGPJHC 817; [2022] 4 All SA 905 (GJ) (17 October 2022)
An agreement entered into by a financial services provider that is not licensed under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS Act) is void ab initio due to non-compliance with statutory licensing requirements. Consequently, any such agreement is unenforceable.
Vodacom (Pty) Ltd v Makate and Another (Case no 401/2022) [2024] ZASCA 14 (06 February 2024)
A third person nominated to fix a price or make a valuation must exercise the judgment of a reasonable person. If their judgment leads to a patently inequitable result, it can be corrected on equitable grounds
Sandown Travel (Pty) Ltd v Cricket South Africa (42317*2011) [2012] ZAGPJHC 249; 2013 (2) SA 502 (GSJ) (7 December 2012)
Contract law through the cases: This principle, known as the repentance doctrine, allows the innocent party to reconsider their position and cancel the agreement when the defaulting party continues to breach the contract.
Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd[1985] ZASCA 6; [1985] 2 All SA 161 (A) (27 March 1985)
Contract law through the cases: When a contract contains distinct and separable obligations, a party's acceptance of the repudiation of one obligation does not necessarily affect their rights under another obligation within the same contract.
![University of Johannesburg v Auckland Park Theological Seminary and Another [2021] ZACC 13.](https://media.beehiiv.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,width=800,height=421,fit=scale-down,onerror=redirect/uploads/asset/file/b1780b1d-acb0-4894-871b-e79daea02de9/lady_justice_1.jpg)
Capitec Bank Holdings Limited and Another v Coral Lagoon Investments 194 (Pty) Ltd and Others (470/2020) [2021] ZASCA 99 (09 July 2021)
Contract law through the cases #2: The admissibility of extrinsic evidence, the application of the parol evidence rule, and the limitations of the duty of good faith in contractual relationships.